Search for: All records

The diffusion of proteins is significantly affected by macromolecular crowding. Molecular simulations accounting for protein interactions at atomic resolution are useful for characterizing the diffusion patterns in crowded environments. We present a comprehensive analysis of protein diffusion under different crowding conditions based on our recent docking-based approach simulating an intracellular crowded environment by sampling the intermolecular energy landscape using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo protocol. The procedure was extensively benchmarked, and the results are in very good agreement with the available experimental and theoretical data. The translational and rotational diffusion rates were determined for different types of proteins under crowding conditions in a broad range of concentrations. A protein system representing most abundant protein types in the E. coli cytoplasm was simulated, as well as large systems of other proteins of varying sizes in heterogeneous and self-crowding solutions. Dynamics of individual proteins was analyzed as a function of concentration and different diffusion rates in homogeneous and heterogeneous crowding. Smaller proteins diffused faster in heterogeneous crowding of larger molecules, compared to their diffusion in the self-crowded solution. Larger proteins displayed the opposite behavior, diffusing faster in the self-crowded solution. The results show the predictive power of our structure-based simulation approach for long timescales of cell-size systems at atomic resolution. 

Abstract Structural information of protein–protein interactions is essential for characterization of life processes at the molecular level. While a small fraction of known protein interactions has experimentally determined structures, computational modeling of protein complexes (protein docking) has to fill the gap. TheDockgroundresource (http://dockground.compbio.ku.edu) provides a collection of datasets for the development and testing of protein docking techniques. Currently,Dockgroundcontains datasets for the bound and the unbound (experimentally determined and simulated) protein structures, model–model complexes, docking decoys of experimentally determined and modeled proteins, and templates for comparative docking. TheDockgroundbound proteins dataset is a core set, from which otherDockgrounddatasets are generated. It is devised as a relational PostgreSQL database containing information on experimentally determined protein–protein complexes. This report on theDockgroundresource describes current status of the datasets, new automated update procedures and further development of the core datasets. We also present a newDockgroundinteractive web interface, which allows search by various parameters, such as release date, multimeric state, complex type, structure resolution, and so on, visualization of the search results with a number of customizable parameters, as well as downloadable datasets with predefined levels of sequence and structure redundancy. 

Abstract Protein docking is essential for structural characterization of protein interactions. Besides providing the structure of protein complexes, modeling of proteins and their complexes is important for understanding the fundamental principles and specific aspects of protein interactions. The accuracy of protein modeling, in general, is still less than that of the experimental approaches. Thus, it is important to investigate the applicability of docking techniques to modeled proteins. We present new comprehensive benchmark sets of protein models for the development and validation of protein docking, as well as a systematic assessment of free and template‐based docking techniques on these sets. As opposed to previous studies, the benchmark sets reflect the real case modeling/docking scenario where the accuracy of the models is assessed by the modeling procedure, without reference to the native structure (which would be unknown in practical applications). We also expanded the analysis to include docking of protein pairs where proteins have different structural accuracy. The results show that, in general, the template‐based docking is less sensitive to the structural inaccuracies of the models than the free docking. The near‐native docking poses generated by the template‐based approach, typically, also have higher ranks than those produces by the free docking (although the free docking is indispensable in modeling the multiplicity of protein interactions in a crowded cellular environment). The results show that docking techniques are applicable to protein models in a broad range of modeling accuracy. The study provides clear guidelines for practical applications of docking to protein models.